Printer Friendly Version

Section: Surgery
Number: S-174
Topic: Surgical Interruption of Pelvic Nerve Pathways for Primary and Secondary Dysmenorrhea
Effective Date: September 5, 2005
Issued Date: February 12, 2007
Date Last Reviewed: 01/2007

General Policy Guidelines

Indications and Limitations of Coverage

Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA)(58999) is considered experimental/investigational in the treatment of severe refractory dysmenorrhea and chronic disabling midline pelvic pain.  The published data regarding the efficacy and long term outcomes of this procedure are inadequate to permit scientific conclusions.  Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation is not covered and not eligible for payment.  A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for this procedure.

Presacral neurectomy (PSN)(58999) is considered eligible for the treatment of refractory dysmenorrhea and chronic disabling midline pelvic pain in cases where conservative non-surgical treatment options (oral contraceptives or other hormonal therapies and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs NSAIDs) have been exhausted.  The use of PSN in the absence of documented failure of non-surgical treatment options, or for lateral rather than midline pelvic pain, is considered not medically necessary, and is not eligible for coverage.  A participating, preferred, or network provider cannot bill the member for the denied service.

Description

Dysmenorrhea is defined as the occurrence of painful menstrual cramps of uterine origin.  Dysmenorrhea has been categorized as either primary or secondary.  Primary dysmenorrhea occurs in the absence of pelvic pathology or other identifiable cause.  Secondary dysmenorrhea refers to pelvic pain from an identifiable pathologic cause, such as pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, adenomyosis, intrauterine adhesions, fibroids, etc. 

Chronic pelvic pain is commonly treated using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), oral contraceptives, and other hormonal therapies.  Patients with secondary dysmenorrhea may undergo surgery for lysis of adhesions, removal of areas of endometriosis, or other procedures to correct the underlying cause of chronic pelvic pain.

Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation and presacral neurectomy involve the interruption of pelvic sensory nerve fibers in order to reduce or eliminate chronic disabling midline pelvic pain and severe refractory dysmenorrhea in women who have failed more conservative attempts at treatment.

Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation involves the transection of the uterosacral ligaments at their insertion into the cervix.  These ligaments contain the main nerve supply to the uterus and cervix.  Presacral neurectomy interrupts a greater number of nerve pathways than LUNA, and involves the interruption of the presacral nerves through the transection of the superior hypogastric plexus, at the level of the sacrum.


NOTE:
This policy is designed to address medical guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness, or condition. Each person's unique clinical circumstances may warrant individual consideration, based on review of applicable medical records.

Procedure Codes

58999     

Traditional Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

FEP Guidelines

Under the Federal Employee Program program, laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA)(58999) and presacral neurectomy (PSN)(58999) are not covered procedures.

PPO Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

Managed Care POS Guidelines

Refer to General Policy Guidelines

Publications

References

Surgical Interruption of Pelvic Nerve Pathways for Primary and Secondary Dysmenorrhea, Medical Policy Reference Manual, Policy 4.01.17, 04/16/04

A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Uterine Nerve Ablation for Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 111, September 2004 

Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Resection for Dysmenorrhea Associated with Endometriosis: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial, Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 80, August, 2003 

Addition of Laparoscopic Uterine Nerve Ablation to Laparoscopic Bipolar Coagulation of Uterine Vessels for Women with Uterine Myomas and Dysmenorrhea, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, Vol. 8, November 2001 

Consensus Statement for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis: Proceedings of an Expert-Panel Consensus Process, Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 78, November 2002 

Comparison of Laparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy and Laparoscopic Uterine Nerve Ablation for Primary Dysmenorrhea, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 41, July 1996 

Long-Term Effectiveness of Presacral Neurectomy for the Treatment of Severe Dysmenorrhea Due to Endometriosis, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, Vol. 11, February 2004 

Effectiveness of Presacral Neurectomy in Women with Severe Dysmenorrhea Caused by Endometriosis Who Were Treated with Laparoscopic Conservative Surgery:  A 1-Year Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial, The American Journal of Obstetric Gynecology, July 2003 

Are the Long Term Adverse Effects of Laparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy for the Management of Central Pain Associated with Endometriosis Acceptable?  The Primary Care Update for OB/Gyns, Vol. 5, July 1998 

The Efficacy and Complications of Laparoscopic Presacral Neurectomy in Pelvic Pain, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 90, December 1997 

View Previous Versions

[Version 001 of S-174]

Table Attachment

Text Attachment

Procedure Code Attachment


Glossary





This policy is designed to address medical guidelines that are appropriate for the majority of individuals with a particular disease, illness, or condition. Each person's unique clinical circumstances may warrant individual consideration, based on review of applicable medical records.

Medical policies are designed to supplement the terms of a member's contract. The member's contract defines the benefits available; therefore, medical policies should not be construed as overriding specific contract language. In the event of conflict, the contract shall govern.

Medical policies do not constitute medical advice, nor the practice of medicine. Rather, such policies are intended only to establish general guidelines for coverage and reimbursement under Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield plans. Application of a medical policy to determine coverage in an individual instance is not intended and shall not be construed to supercede the professional judgment of a treating provider. In all situations, the treating provider must use his/her professional judgment to provide care he/she believes to be in the best interest of the patient, and the provider and patient remain responsible for all treatment decisions.

Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield (MSBCBS) retains the right to review and update its medical policy guidelines at its sole discretion. These guidelines are the proprietary information of MSBCBS. Any sale, copying or dissemination of the medical policies is prohibited; however, limited copying of medical policies is permitted for individual use.



back to top