Mountain State Medical Policy Bulletin |
Section: | Laboratory |
Number: | L-28 |
Topic: | Tumor Markers |
Effective Date: | January 1, 2009 |
Issued Date: | October 12, 2009 |
Date Last Reviewed: | 12/2008 |
Indications and Limitations of Coverage
The following tumor markers are eligible for payment when medically necessary and should be processed as follows:
The use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (88365) is payable when reported as an adjunct to cystoscopy in the diagnosis (in persons with hematuria suspected of having bladder cancer) and monitoring of bladder cancer (188.0-188.9, 198.1, 233.7, 239.4, 599.70-599.72, V10.51). The use of the ImmunoCyt test (88346) is payable when reported as an adjunct to cytology and cystoscopy to monitor for bladder cancer recurrence (188.0-188.9, 198.1, 233.7, 239.4, V10.51). Date Last Reviewed: 06/2009 Circulating Tumor Cells Testing The detection and quantification of circulating tumor cells (S3711) is considered experimental/investigational in the management of patients with cancer. There is insufficient evidence that this technology is equal to or better than any existing tumor markers in its efficacy and clinical utility. It has not been demonstrated that overall health outcomes are affected for patients with metastatic cancer. A participating, preferred, or network provider can bill the member for the denied test. Date Last Reviewed: 01/2009 Description Radioimmunoassay and immunohistochemical determination of the serum levels of certain proteins or carbohydrates have been developed as "markers" for various cancers. Normal cells express these chemicals in low quantities. Tumor size and grade are believed to be reflected by significant elevations in serum concentration of these markers. The uses of tumor marker testing include screening, diagnosis and monitoring response to treatment. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) is a molecular cytogenetic test used to investigate chromosomal abnormalities associated with cancer and genetic disorders. The major difference between the FISH test and the immunoassay tests is that they detect different substances and use different detection methods. FISH DNA probe technology is a technique to visualize nucleic acid sequences within cells by creating short sequences of fluorescently labeled, single-stranded DNA called probes, that match target sequences. The probes bind to complementary strands of DNA, allowing for identification of the locations of the chromosomes targeted. The ImmunoCyt test uses fluorescence immunohistochemistry using antibodies to mucin glycoprotein and a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). These antigens are found on bladder tumor cells. This test is intended to augment the sensitivity of cytology for the detection of tumor cells in the urine of individuals previously diagnosed with bladder cancer. It is indicated for use in conjunction with cytoscopy as an aid in the management of bladder cancer. Circulating Tumor Cells Testing Studies have suggested that the presence of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic carcinoma is associated with short survival. Detecting and quantifying circulating tumor cells may be useful in providing an immediate assessment of response to chemotherapy rather than relying on changes in imaging studies (i.e., computed tomography scans). In addition, the presence of circulating tumor cells has been investigated as an additional prognostic factor in women with breast cancer without metastases, which could be used to determine the need for additional adjuvant chemotherapy. The CellSearch™ System (Veridex) is an example of such a technology. The technique involves identification of the circulating tumor cells, which are tagged using antibody-coated magnetic beads that recognize cell surface antigens. The cells are then labeled with fluorescent dyes, which can then be quantified by a semiautomated fluorescent-based microscopy system. |
|
82105 | 82107 | 82378 | 84152 | 84153 | 84154 |
86294 | 86300 | 86301 | 86304 | 86316 | 88346 |
88365 | G0103 | S3711 |
This medical policy may not apply to FEP. Medial policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Benefits are determined by the Federal Employee Program. |
National Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Medical Policy 2.04.07, Urinary Tumor Markers for Bladder Cancer, 4:2006 Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (Remark), Breast Cancer Res Treat, Volume 100, No. 2, 11/2006 ASCO Practice Guidelines on Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management in the Adjuvant Setting, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Volume 24, No. 31, 11/2006 ASCO Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Volume 24, No. 33, 11/2006 Diagnostic Utility of the ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ Test in Bladder Cancer, Rev Urol, Volume 8, No. 4, Fall/2006 Performance of Urine Test in Patients Monitored for Recurrence of Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Study in the United States, J Urol, Volume 174, No. 4Pt1, 10/2005 Borglum T, Rehfeld J, Drivsholm L, Hilsted L. Processing-Independent Quantitation of Chromogranin A in Plasma from Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors and Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas. Clinical Chemistry. March 2007;53(3):438-446. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, et. al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. November 20, 2007;25(33). Accessed May 12, 2009. Goral V, Yesilbagdan H, Kaplan A, Sit D. Evaluation of CA 72-4 as a New Tumor Marker in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Hetapo-Gastroenterology. 2007;54:1272-1275. Sturgeon C, Duffy M, Stenman U, et. al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast and Ovarian Cancers. Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54(12):e11-e79. Nossov V, Amneus M, Su F. The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. September 2008;199(3). Accessed May 22, 2009. Ramirez M, Nelson E, Evans C. Beyond Prostate-Specific Antigen: Alternate Serum Markers. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(3). Accessed September 24, 2008. Papadopoulos G, Iordanidou L, Stathouros G, et. al. Evaluation of Urine Tumor-Associated Trypsin Inhibitor, CYFRA 21-1, and Urinary Bladder Cancer Antigen for Detection of High-Grade Bladder Carcinoma. Urology. November 2008;72(5). Amonkar S, Bertenshaw G, Chen T-H.et. al. Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Multivariate Index Assay for Ovarian Cancer. Ovarian Cancer Assay. February 2009;4(2). Accessed May 22, 2009. Zhu Z-H, Sun B-Y, Ma Y, et. al. Three Immunomarker Support Vector Machines-Based Prognostic Classifiers for Stage IB Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. March 1, 2009;27(7). American Cancer Society. Tumor Markers. The American Cancer Society. www.cancer.org. Accessed May 12, 2009. American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2006 Update of ASCO Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancer. Journal of Oncology Practice;2(6). www.jop.ascopubs.org. Accessed May 11, 2009. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Early Detection Key in Ovarian Cancer. www.nccs.com/Making-Treatment-Decisions. Accessed June 2, 2009. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Use of Tumor Markers in Clinical Practice Quality Requirements. www.aacc.org/members/nacb/LMPG/OnlineGuide/PublishedGuidelines/tumor/Documents/TumorMarkers2008 Accessed June 8, 2009. BC Cancer Agency. Cancer Management Guidelines – Neuroendocrine. www.bccancer.bc.ca/nr/bcca/asp. Accessed June 8, 2009. |